On October 26, 2016 5:35 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:39 PM
>>
>> On October 26, 2016 1:20 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> >> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:3
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:39 PM
>
> On October 26, 2016 1:20 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:36 PM
> >>
> >> On October 24, 2016 3:02 PM, Tian, Kev
On October 25, 2016 9:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk < konrad.w...@oracle.com >
wrote:
>>
>
>Could you describe what the KVM implementation solution did that made it clean?
>I am curious whether the concept could be put in Xen?
Konrad, I am still learning this part. I will update it later.
Quan
__
On October 26, 2016 1:20 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:36 PM
>>
>> On October 24, 2016 3:02 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> >> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:28 P
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 4:36 PM
>
> On October 24, 2016 3:02 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:28 PM
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Back to the main open before ho
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 08:36:23AM +, Xuquan (Quan Xu) wrote:
> On October 24, 2016 3:02 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:28 PM
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>Back to the main open before holiday - multiple EOIs may come t
On October 25, 2016 4:36 PM, Quan Xu wrote:
>I am afraid we could find a clean solution based on current implementation (kvm
Sorry, a typo..
s/could/could not/
>is ok).. and apicv results in decreased application performance for some
>windows
>guest.
>
>So I suggest to configure ' msr_based_ap
On October 24, 2016 3:02 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:28 PM
>>
>> >>
>> >>Back to the main open before holiday - multiple EOIs may come to
>> >>clear irq_issued before guest actually handles the very vpt
>> >>inject
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:28 PM
>
> >>
> >>Back to the main open before holiday - multiple EOIs may come to clear
> >>irq_issued before guest actually handles the very vpt injection
> >>(possible if vpt vector is shared with other sourc
Sorry I haven't got on this thread yet, but want you know it's on my list
(hopefully will respond next week).
> -Original Message-
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 5:28 PM
> To: Xuquan (Quan Xu); Tian, Kevin; Jan Beulich
> Cc: Andrew Co
On October 11, 2016 7:11 PM, Xuquan < xuqu...@huawei.com > wrote:
>On October 11, 2016 3:49 PM, Tian, Kevin
>>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 6:49 PM
>>>
>>> On October 10, 2016 5:40 PM, Jan Beulich < jbeul...@suse.com > wrote:
>>> >> >>>
On October 11, 2016 3:49 PM, Tian, Kevin
>> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 6:49 PM
>>
>> On October 10, 2016 5:40 PM, Jan Beulich < jbeul...@suse.com > wrote:
>> >> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
>> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic
> From: Xuquan (Quan Xu) [mailto:xuqu...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 6:49 PM
>
> On October 10, 2016 5:40 PM, Jan Beulich < jbeul...@suse.com > wrote:
> >> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>
On October 10, 2016 5:40 PM, Jan Beulich < jbeul...@suse.com > wrote:
>> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>> > @@ -433,6 +433,12 @@ void vlapic_EOI_set(struct vlapic *vlapic)
>> > void vlapic_handle_EOI(s
>>> On 10.10.16 at 11:21, wrote:
> On September 26, 2016 2:39 PM, Jan Beulich < jbeul...@suse.com > wrote:
> On 24.09.16 at 03:06, wrote:
>>> On September 24, 2016 7:34 AM, Tian Kevin < kevin.t...@intel.com > wrote:
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Friday, Septem
On September 26, 2016 2:39 PM, Jan Beulich < jbeul...@suse.com > wrote:
On 24.09.16 at 03:06, wrote:
>> On September 24, 2016 7:34 AM, Tian Kevin < kevin.t...@intel.com > wrote:
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 11:34 PM
>>> On 2
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 2:35 PM
>
> >>> On 24.09.16 at 01:34, wrote:
> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 11:34 PM
> >>
> >> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hv
>>> On 24.09.16 at 03:06, wrote:
> On September 24, 2016 7:34 AM, Tian Kevin < kevin.t...@intel.com > wrote:
>>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 11:34 PM
>>>
>>> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
>>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>>> > +++ b/xe
>>> On 24.09.16 at 01:34, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 11:34 PM
>>
>> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>> > @@ -433,6 +433,12 @@ void vlapic_EOI_set(struct vla
On September 24, 2016 7:34 AM, Tian Kevin < kevin.t...@intel.com > wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 11:34 PM
>>
>> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
>> > @@ -433,6 +43
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 11:34 PM
>
> >>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> > @@ -433,6 +433,12 @@ void vlapic_EOI_set(struct vlapic *vlapic)
> > void vlapic_handle_EOI(s
>>> On 20.09.16 at 15:30, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,12 @@ void vlapic_EOI_set(struct vlapic *vlapic)
> void vlapic_handle_EOI(struct vlapic *vlapic, u8 vector)
> {
> struct domain *d = vlapic_domain(vlapic);
> +struct vcp
>From 97760602b5c94745e76ed78d23e8fdf9988d234e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Quan Xu
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:12:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/apicv: fix RTC periodic timer and apicv issue
When Xen apicv is enabled, wall clock time is faster on Windows7-32
guest with high payload (with 2vCPU
23 matches
Mail list logo
