On May 19, 2016 5:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.05.16 at 10:30, wrote:
> > On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
> >> > With other patches also in place, still not work.
> >> > Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
> >>
>>> On 19.05.16 at 10:30, wrote:
> On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
>> > With other patches also in place, still not work.
>> > Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
>>
>> May I ask for another try, with current tip of stagi
On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
> > With other patches also in place, still not work.
> > Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
>
> May I ask for another try, with current tip of staging plus
> http://lists.xenproject.org/arc
On May 03, 2016 9:39 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 03.05.16 at 14:50, wrote:
> > On April 29, 2016 12:11 AM, wrote:
> >> On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> > >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
> >> > > With other patches also in place, still not work.
> >> > > Jianzhong has b
>>> On 03.05.16 at 14:50, wrote:
> On April 29, 2016 12:11 AM, wrote:
>> On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
>> > > With other patches also in place, still not work.
>> > > Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
>> >
>> > May
On April 29, 2016 12:11 AM, wrote:
> On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
> > > With other patches also in place, still not work.
> > > Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
> >
> > May I ask for another try, with current tip of
On April 28, 2016 11:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
> > With other patches also in place, still not work.
> > Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
>
> May I ask for another try, with current tip of staging plus
> http://lists.xenproject.org/arc
>>> On 25.04.16 at 10:40, wrote:
> With other patches also in place, still not work.
> Jianzhong has been left and Quan will take over the task.
May I ask for another try, with current tip of staging plus
http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg03661.html
?
Thanks, Jan
On April 25, 2016 4:41pm, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> > >> >>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
> > >> > 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
> > >> >> ---
> > >> >> I assume this also addresses the issue which
> > >> >>
> > >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-
> 01/msg03189.
> >
> >> >>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
> >> > 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
> >> >> ---
> >> >> I assume this also addresses the issue which
> >> >>
> >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-01/msg03189.
> >> html
> >> >> attempted to deal with in a not really accepta
>>> On 22.04.16 at 04:02, wrote:
> 2016-04-21 22:19 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>
>> >>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
>> > 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>> >> ---
>> >> I assume this also addresses the issue which
>> >>
>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-01/msg031
2016-04-21 22:19 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
> >>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
> > 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
> >> ---
> >> I assume this also addresses the issue which
> >>
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-01/msg03189.html
> >> attempted to deal with in a not
>>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
> 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>> ---
>> I assume this also addresses the issue which
>> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-01/msg03189.html
>> attempted to deal with in a not really acceptable way.
>
> I hope this issue is resolv
(re-adding xen-devel)
>>> On 21.04.16 at 09:48, wrote:
> 2016-04-21 14:24 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>
>> >>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
>> > 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>> >> Forwarding entire batches to the device model when an individual
>> >> iteration of them got rejected by in
>>> On 30.03.16 at 09:28, wrote:
> 2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
>> Forwarding entire batches to the device model when an individual
>> iteration of them got rejected by internal device emulation handlers
>> with X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE is wrong: The device model would then handle
>> all i
2016-03-29 18:39 GMT+08:00 Jan Beulich :
> Forwarding entire batches to the device model when an individual
> iteration of them got rejected by internal device emulation handlers
> with X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE is wrong: The device model would then handle
> all iterations, without the internal handler
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 29 March 2016 11:40
> To: xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Paul Durrant; Chang Jianzhong; Keir (Xen.org)
> Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: fix forwarding of internally cached requests
>
> Forwarding entire batches to th
Forwarding entire batches to the device model when an individual
iteration of them got rejected by internal device emulation handlers
with X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE is wrong: The device model would then handle
all iterations, without the internal handler getting to see any past
the one it returned failu
18 matches
Mail list logo
