Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] tools/libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build

2016-11-16 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:09:18AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 15.11.16 at 17:04, wrote: > > There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We > > pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter. > > > > If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architectu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] tools/libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build

2016-11-15 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 15.11.16 at 17:04, wrote: > There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We > pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter. > > If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will be > built. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky Acked-by: Ja

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] tools/libacpi: Be specific about which DSDT files to build

2016-11-15 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter. If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will be built. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- Changes in v2: * Simpler syntax in libacpi/Makefile when D