>>> On 09.01.17 at 17:58, wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
> adjustments"):
>> Right, I had been thinking of this too, but then wasn't sure to
>> suggest such a mixture. Perhaps the first two options could
>> even remain completely nameless then (I th
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
adjustments"):
> Right, I had been thinking of this too, but then wasn't sure to
> suggest such a mixture. Perhaps the first two options could
> even remain completely nameless then (I think those are the
> ones which had been t
>>> On 09.01.17 at 17:34, wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
> adjustments"):
>> See e.g. the cpufreq=, i.e. we're talking of
>>
>> com1=:,:,...
>
> I think we will have to use `=', so
> com1==,=,...
>
> Since we already have BDFs which I think con
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
adjustments"):
> See e.g. the cpufreq=, i.e. we're talking of
>
> com1=:,:,...
I think we will have to use `=', so
com1==,=,...
Since we already have BDFs which I think contain `:', and that would
be more confusing than the
>>> On 09.01.17 at 16:40, wrote:
> On 01/09/2017 02:10 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 06.01.17 at 19:34, wrote:
>>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
>>> adjustments"):
On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
Well, as you may have seen, things are getting c
On 01/09/2017 02:10 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.01.17 at 19:34, wrote:
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
adjustments"):
On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
Well, as you may have seen, things are getting complicated here:
The two currently-last elements are permi
>>> On 06.01.17 at 19:34, wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
> adjustments"):
>> On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
>> Well, as you may have seen, things are getting complicated here:
>> The two currently-last elements are permitted only with
>> CONFIG_HAS_P
>>> On 06.01.17 at 18:28, wrote:
> On 01/06/2017 10:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2017 08:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.01.17 at 23:39, wrote:
> @@ -1118,6 +1118,20 @@ static void __init ns16550_parse_port_config(
>uart
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] ns16550: Add command line parsing
adjustments"):
> On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
> Well, as you may have seen, things are getting complicated here:
> The two currently-last elements are permitted only with
> CONFIG_HAS_PCI, so by adding the new fields to the end
On 01/06/2017 10:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
On 01/06/2017 08:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.01.17 at 23:39, wrote:
@@ -1118,6 +1118,20 @@ static void __init ns16550_parse_port_config(
uart->clock_hz = simple_strtoul(conf, &conf, 0) << 4;
}
>>> On 06.01.17 at 17:24, wrote:
> On 01/06/2017 08:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.01.17 at 23:39, wrote:
>>> @@ -1118,6 +1118,20 @@ static void __init ns16550_parse_port_config(
>>> uart->clock_hz = simple_strtoul(conf, &conf, 0) << 4;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +if ( *conf == '
On 01/06/2017 08:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.01.17 at 23:39, wrote:
@@ -299,6 +299,15 @@ Both option `com1` and `com2` follow the same format.
the bootloader or other earlier firmware has already set it up.
* Optionally, the base baud rate (usually the highest baud rate the
devic
>>> On 05.01.17 at 23:39, wrote:
> @@ -299,6 +299,15 @@ Both option `com1` and `com2` follow the same format.
>the bootloader or other earlier firmware has already set it up.
> * Optionally, the base baud rate (usually the highest baud rate the
>device can communicate at) can be specified
Add parsing options for reg_width and reg_shift in bootup command line
parameters. This adds flexibility in setting register values
for MMIO UART devices.
Increase length of opt_com1 and opt_com2 buffer to accommodate more
command line parameters.
eg. com1=115200,8n1,0x3f8,4 (legacy IO)
eg. com1=
On 05/01/17 22:39, Swapnil Paratey wrote:
> Add parsing options for reg_width and reg_shift in bootup command line
> parameters. This adds flexibility in setting register values
> for MMIO UART devices.
>
> Increase length of opt_com1 and opt_com2 buffer to accommodate more
> command line parameter
15 matches
Mail list logo