Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-18 Thread Tim Deegan
At 19:02 +0100 on 17 Sep (1442516564), Ian Jackson wrote: > Tim Deegan writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for > xen/common/"): > > I would rather your v1 plus an appropriate change to get_maintainers. > > I am happy to implement in get_maintainers whatever is decided. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-17 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> Ian Jackson 09/17/15 8:02 PM >>> >Tim Deegan writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for >xen/common/"): >> I would rather your v1 plus an appropriate change to get_maintainers. > >I am happy to implement in get_maintainers whatever is decided. > >At the moment there is one

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Tim Deegan writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/"): > I would rather your v1 plus an appropriate change to get_maintainers. I am happy to implement in get_maintainers whatever is decided. At the moment there is one kind of fallback: (i) `THE REST' gets CCd if

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-17 Thread Tim Deegan
At 12:53 +0100 on 17 Sep (1442494439), Ian Jackson wrote: > This is a copy of the `THE REST' entry but with my own entry removed > (as I do not normally review hypervisor patches) and Andrew Cooper's > added (which seems appropriate given his status as x86 hypervisor > maintainer). > > The effect

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-17 Thread Julien Grall
On 17/09/15 12:59, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 17/09/15 12:53, Ian Jackson wrote: >> This is a copy of the `THE REST' entry but with my own entry removed >> (as I do not normally review hypervisor patches) and Andrew Cooper's >> added (which seems appropriate given his status as x86 hypervisor >> mai

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-17 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 17/09/15 12:53, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is a copy of the `THE REST' entry but with my own entry removed > (as I do not normally review hypervisor patches) and Andrew Cooper's > added (which seems appropriate given his status as x86 hypervisor > maintainer). > > The effect is that patches touch

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: Document maintainers for xen/common/

2015-09-17 Thread Ian Jackson
This is a copy of the `THE REST' entry but with my own entry removed (as I do not normally review hypervisor patches) and Andrew Cooper's added (which seems appropriate given his status as x86 hypervisor maintainer). The effect is that patches touching xen/common/ will no longer be CC'd to me; but