Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] xen pvusb toolstack work

2015-12-10 Thread Chun Yan Liu
>>> On 12/10/2015 at 08:05 PM, in message <1449749113-1243-1-git-send-email-george.dun...@eu.citrix.com>, George Dunlap wrote: > Chunyan, > > I did a thorough review of v3, and almost all the comments I had fell > into two categories: > > 1. Trivial things that could be easily fixed >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] xen pvusb toolstack work

2015-12-10 Thread George Dunlap
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Changes to V9: > * Rebased to staging (ec0712576198633dd7fbfe25290b030d5a23b252) > * Lots of changes to patch 3/5 > * Removed patches related to "list-assignable-devices" functionality And this is because, as I have said elsewhere, I think

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] xen pvusb toolstack work

2015-12-10 Thread George Dunlap
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > Chunyan, > > I did a thorough review of v3, I meant "patch 3 of v9"... (the one labelled RESEND, with the updated naming scheme). -George ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 0/5] xen pvusb toolstack work

2015-12-10 Thread George Dunlap
Chunyan, I did a thorough review of v3, and almost all the comments I had fell into two categories: 1. Trivial things that could be easily fixed 2. Complicated things that would be difficult to explain and might take several rounds to correct. As such, I hope you don't mind that I took the libe