mcg...@kernel.org,a...@redhat.com,t...@linutronix.de,mi...@redhat.com,jpoim...@redhat.com,b...@alien8.de,li...@arm.linux.org.uk,mhira...@kernel.org,masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com,jba...@akamai.com,heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com,ana...@linux.vnet.ibm.com,anil.s.keshavamur...@intel.com,da...@davemloft.ne
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:57:18PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 04:41 PM, mcg...@kernel.org wrote:
> > Please let me know if there are any issue or questions.
>
> Only that this has been the majority of the traffic on the linux-sh
> mailing list for over a month and I'm still not sure
On 08/19/2016 04:41 PM, mcg...@kernel.org wrote:
> Please let me know if there are any issue or questions.
Only that this has been the majority of the traffic on the linux-sh
mailing list for over a month and I'm still not sure why anyone should care.
I have no idea what problem it solves, despit
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
The original v3 series for linker tables made reference only to
an external repository userspace sandbox application, however
Boris noted it'd be difficult ot keep this in sync with the
kernel so advised to consider integrate with the kernel. I've
taken steps in this dir
