On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:51 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On 03/03/2015 11:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> I'm not sure to follow here. Do you think MAP_SMALL_PAGES should be
> >> defined as WRITE_ALLOC?
> >
> > Sorry I just meant that:
> > +#define PAGE_HYPERVISOR_WC ((DEV_WC) | PTE_P
On 03/03/2015 11:47, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not sure to follow here. Do you think MAP_SMALL_PAGES should be
defined as WRITE_ALLOC?
Sorry I just meant that:
+#define PAGE_HYPERVISOR_WC ((DEV_WC) | PTE_PRESENT )
should be just:
+#define PAGE_HYPERVISOR_WC (DEV_WC |
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:17 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 03/03/2015 10:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:28 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Julien Grall
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015
Hi Ian,
On 03/03/2015 10:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:28 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:38 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 24/02/2015 09:31, Ian Campbe
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 13:28 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:38 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>> Hi Ian,
> >>>
> >>> On 24/02/2015 09:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 201
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:38 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Ian,
>>>
>>> On 24/02/2015 09:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 13:03 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> +{
>>> On 24.02.15 at 14:47, wrote:
> lpae_t is an uint64_t and flags an unsigned int, so we will have to
> check that any bits we have to modified is effectively living on the
> less significant word.
Or, upon extraction, fold all flags into something fitting into 32 bits,
like we do on x86.
Jan
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:59 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 24/02/15 10:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:38 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Hi Ian,
> >>
> >> On 24/02/2015 09:31, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 13:03 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > +
Hello Vijay,
On 18/02/2015 12:56, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
On x86, for the pages mapped with PAGE_HYPERVISOR attribute
non-leaf page tables are allocated with valid pte entries.
and with MAP_SMALL_PAGES attribute only non-leaf page tables are
allocated with invalid (v
From: Vijaya Kumar K
On x86, for the pages mapped with PAGE_HYPERVISOR attribute
non-leaf page tables are allocated with valid pte entries.
and with MAP_SMALL_PAGES attribute only non-leaf page tables are
allocated with invalid (valid bit set to 0) pte entries.
However on arm this is not the case
10 matches
Mail list logo
