> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 19 November 2015 10:18
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini;
> xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Keir (Xen.org)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/hvm/viridian: flu
>>> On 19.11.15 at 10:43, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> @@ -2452,6 +2452,13 @@ int hvm_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
> if ( rc != 0 )
> goto fail6;
>
> +if ( is_viridian_domain(d) )
> +{
> +rc = viridian_init(v);
I think t
The Microsoft Hypervisor Top Level Functional Spec. (section 3.4) defines
two bits in CPUID leaf 0x4004:EAX for the hypervisor to recommend
whether or not to issue a hypercall for local or remote TLB flush.
Whilst it's doubtful whether using a hypercall for local TLB flush would
be any more ef
