On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:05:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:30 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Konrad: here is a set of fixes for libxl which ought IMO to be in 4.5.
> > See below, or the rest of the thread, for details. It's broken up
> > into 6 tiny patches for ease of
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:30 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Konrad: here is a set of fixes for libxl which ought IMO to be in 4.5.
> See below, or the rest of the thread, for details. It's broken up
> into 6 tiny patches for ease of review.
Konrad did I miss you reply/ack here or has one yet to be gi
On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 18:30 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Konrad: here is a set of fixes for libxl which ought IMO to be in 4.5.
> See below, or the rest of the thread, for details. It's broken up
> into 6 tiny patches for ease of review.
I tested an identical version of this series, just without t
Konrad: here is a set of fixes for libxl which ought IMO to be in 4.5.
See below, or the rest of the thread, for details. It's broken up
into 6 tiny patches for ease of review.
Ian Jackson writes ("[PATCH for-4.5 0/6] libxl: events: Tear down fd interests
when idle"):
> If libxl_event_register_c
If libxl_event_register_callbacks is called with nonzero hooks while
any part of libxl has any fd interests registered internally, then:
* There is no way for libxl to notify the application that it wants
to be told about these fds, because the spec in the doc comment
says that the new hook
