Hi Chen,
On 01/06/2015 01:56, Chen Baozi wrote:
For instance, with your series a cluster can use up to 16 cores but the
GIC-500 is only supporting up to 8 cores...
Well, if 4096 is a acceptable value, it will cost 512M address space for GICR_*
(We need to chagne patch #1 too). Although we do h
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 07:21:22PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> On 31/05/2015 16:37, Chen Baozi wrote:
> >
> >>On May 31, 2015, at 21:40, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Chen,
> >>
> >>On 30/05/2015 12:07, Chen Baozi wrote:
> >>>From: Chen Baozi
> >>>
> >>>GIC-500 supports up to 128
Hi Chen,
On 31/05/2015 16:37, Chen Baozi wrote:
On May 31, 2015, at 21:40, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Chen,
On 30/05/2015 12:07, Chen Baozi wrote:
From: Chen Baozi
GIC-500 supports up to 128 cores in a single SoC. Increase MAX_VIRT_CPUS
to 128 on arm64.
Where did you find this restriction?
> On May 31, 2015, at 21:40, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Chen,
>
> On 30/05/2015 12:07, Chen Baozi wrote:
>> From: Chen Baozi
>>
>> GIC-500 supports up to 128 cores in a single SoC. Increase MAX_VIRT_CPUS
>> to 128 on arm64.
>
> Where did you find this restriction? AFAICT the changes you made
Hi Chen,
On 30/05/2015 12:07, Chen Baozi wrote:
From: Chen Baozi
GIC-500 supports up to 128 cores in a single SoC. Increase MAX_VIRT_CPUS
to 128 on arm64.
Where did you find this restriction? AFAICT the changes you made in the
vGICv3 driver allow us to use up to 4096 CPUs.
Regards,
--
Ju
From: Chen Baozi
GIC-500 supports up to 128 cores in a single SoC. Increase MAX_VIRT_CPUS
to 128 on arm64.
Since the domain_max_vcpus has been changed to depends on vgic_ops,
we could have done more work in order to drop the definition of
MAX_VIRT_CPUS. However, because it is still used for some
