> >> wrote:
> >>> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add
> >>> pvusb API [and 1 more messages]"):
> >>>>> Yes. The whole point of paths like this is that they are stable if
> >>>>> the physi
On 06/17/2015 04:59 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 06:34 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Ian Jackson
>> wrote:
>>> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add
>>> pvusb API [and 1 more messages]&q
On 06/16/2015 06:34 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API [and 1
more messages]"):
Yes. The whole point of paths like this is that they are stable if
the physica
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API
> [and 1 more messages]"):
>> > Yes. The whole point of paths like this is that they are stable if
>> > the physical topology
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API [and
1 more messages]"):
> On 06/16/2015 02:37 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb
> > API"> >> /sys/devices/pc
Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 4:41:52 PM, you wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 02:37 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API"):
>>> Remember that the path you gave in your previous e-mail isn't the path
>>> for the *usb device*, it's the path for the *
On 06/16/2015 02:37 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API"):
>> Remember that the path you gave in your previous e-mail isn't the path
>> for the *usb device*, it's the path for the *block device*. It
>> contains a PCI address, but it l
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 3/7] libxl: add pvusb API"):
> Remember that the path you gave in your previous e-mail isn't the path
> for the *usb device*, it's the path for the *block device*. It
> contains a PCI address, but it looks like it also contains part of the
> USB top
