On 1/26/2016 12:28 PM, Meng Xu wrote:
Hi Dario and Tianyang,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:00 -0500, Meng Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tianyang Chen
wrote:
I have removed some of the Ccs so they won't get bothered as we
discu
Hi Dario and Tianyang,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:00 -0500, Meng Xu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tianyang Chen
>> wrote:
>> > I have removed some of the Ccs so they won't get bothered as we
>> > discussed
>> > previously.
>> >
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 18:00 -0500, Meng Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tianyang Chen
> wrote:
> > I have removed some of the Ccs so they won't get bothered as we
> > discussed
> > previously.
> >
> > On 1/25/2016 4:00 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 05:2
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:04 -0500, Tianyang Chen wrote:
> I have removed some of the Ccs so they won't get bothered as we
> discussed previously.
>
Yeah... I said you should have done that in the first place, and then
Cc-ed them myself! Sorry... :-P
> On 1/25/2016 4:00 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
> I have removed some of the Ccs so they won't get bothered as we discussed
> previously.
>
> On 1/25/2016 4:00 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 05:20 -0500, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> @@ -147,6 +148,16 @@ static unsi
I have removed some of the Ccs so they won't get bothered as we
discussed previously.
On 1/25/2016 4:00 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 05:20 -0500, Tianyang Chen wrote:
@@ -147,6 +148,16 @@ static unsigned int nr_rt_ops;
* Global lock is referenced by schedule_data.schedul
On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 05:20 -0500, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>
> @@ -147,6 +148,16 @@ static unsigned int nr_rt_ops;
> * Global lock is referenced by schedule_data.schedule_lock from all
> * physical cpus. It can be grabbed via vcpu_schedule_lock_irq()
> */
> +
> +/* dedicated timer for replenish
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/15/2016 10:33 AM, Meng Xu wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/31/2015 8:44 AM, Meng Xu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Tianyang Chen
wrote:
>>>
On 1/15/2016 10:33 AM, Meng Xu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
On 12/31/2015 8:44 AM, Meng Xu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
Budget replenishment is now handled by a dedicated timer which is
triggered at the most imminent rele
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/31/2015 8:44 AM, Meng Xu wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Budget replenishment is now handled by a dedicated timer which is
>>> triggered at the most imminent release time of all runna
On 12/31/2015 8:44 AM, Meng Xu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
Budget replenishment is now handled by a dedicated timer which is
triggered at the most imminent release time of all runnable vcpus.
Changes since V1:
None
Signed-off-by: Tianyang Chen
Signed-
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Tianyang Chen wrote:
>
> Budget replenishment is now handled by a dedicated timer which is
> triggered at the most imminent release time of all runnable vcpus.
>
> Changes since V1:
> None
>
> Signed-off-by: Tianyang Chen
> Signed-off-by: Meng Xu
> Signed-off
Budget replenishment is now handled by a dedicated timer which is
triggered at the most imminent release time of all runnable vcpus.
Changes since V1:
None
Signed-off-by: Tianyang Chen
Signed-off-by: Meng Xu
Signed-off-by: Dagaen Golomb
---
xen/common/sched_rt.c | 159 +++
13 matches
Mail list logo