On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 12:00:29PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > In Xen 4.6 commit cd2f100f0f61b3f333d52d1737
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > In Xen 4.6 commit cd2f100f0f61b3f333d52d1737dd73f02daee592
> > > "libxc: Fix do_memory_op to return negative value on er
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > In Xen 4.6 commit cd2f100f0f61b3f333d52d1737dd73f02daee592
> > "libxc: Fix do_memory_op to return negative value on errors"
> > made the libxc API less odd-ball: On errors, re
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> In Xen 4.6 commit cd2f100f0f61b3f333d52d1737dd73f02daee592
> "libxc: Fix do_memory_op to return negative value on errors"
> made the libxc API less odd-ball: On errors, return value is
> -1 and error code is in errno. On success the return value
>
In Xen 4.6 commit cd2f100f0f61b3f333d52d1737dd73f02daee592
"libxc: Fix do_memory_op to return negative value on errors"
made the libxc API less odd-ball: On errors, return value is
-1 and error code is in errno. On success the return value
is either 0 or an positive value.
Since we could be runnin