On 06/16/2016 04:54 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:15:22AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> [...]
>>> +static int init_acpi_config(struct xc_dom_image *dom,
>>> +struct acpi_config *config)
>>> +{
>>> +xc_interface *xch = dom->xch;
>>> +uint32_t d
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:15:22AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
[...]
> > +static int init_acpi_config(struct xc_dom_image *dom,
> > +struct acpi_config *config)
> > +{
> > +xc_interface *xch = dom->xch;
> > +uint32_t domid = dom->guest_domid;
> > +xc_dominf
>>> On 07.06.16 at 16:47, wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 10:10 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.06.16 at 15:59, wrote:
>>> On 06/07/2016 02:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.06.16 at 18:59, wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
> RESE
On 06/07/2016 10:10 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.06.16 at 15:59, wrote:
>> On 06/07/2016 02:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.06.16 at 18:59, wrote:
On 06/06/2016 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
>> +#define RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START 0xFC0
>>> On 07.06.16 at 15:59, wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 02:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.06.16 at 18:59, wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2016 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
> +#define RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START 0xFC001000
> +#define ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS
On 06/07/2016 02:17 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.06.16 at 18:59, wrote:
>> On 06/06/2016 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
+#define RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START 0xFC001000
+#define ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS 0x000EA020
+
+/* Initial allo
>>> On 06.06.16 at 18:59, wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
>>> +#define RESERVED_MEMORY_DYNAMIC_START 0xFC001000
>>> +#define ACPI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS 0x000EA020
>>> +
>>> +/* Initial allocation for ACPI tables */
>>> +#define NUM_ACPI_PA
On 06/06/2016 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_acpi.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +#include
> Why are these two needed here? Th
On 06/06/2016 08:03 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/Makefile b/tools/libxc/Makefile
>> index 608404f..9569e54 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxc/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/libxc/Makefile
>> @@ -79,6 +79,26 @@ GUEST_SRCS-y += $(ELF_SRCS-y)
>> $(patsubst %.c,%.o,$(ELF_SRCS-y)): CFLAGS += -Wno
>>> On 06.04.16 at 03:25, wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_acpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
Why are these two needed here? The code here shouldn't care
about the mode the guest may l
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:25:47PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
> ---
> tools/libxc/Makefile | 22 +++-
> tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h | 1 +
> tools/libxc/xc_acpi.c | 268
> ++
> tools/libxc/x
Thanks for looking into this, I've found a couple of issues when compiling
this with clang.
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 09:25:47PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
> ---
> tools/libxc/Makefile | 22 +++-
> tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h | 1 +
> tool
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
tools/libxc/Makefile | 22 +++-
tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h | 1 +
tools/libxc/xc_acpi.c | 268 ++
tools/libxc/xc_dom_x86.c | 7 +
tools/libxl/libxl_x86.c | 19 +--
xen/c
13 matches
Mail list logo
