On 2017-10-19 at 12:34:07 -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Zhang Yi wrote:
> > From: Zhang Yi Z
> >
> > The Hypercall is defined as HVMOP_set_subpage
>
> Are there any expected use-cases where a HVM guest would need access
> to this hypercall? Is spp compatible wi
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 2:13 AM, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi Z
>
> The Hypercall is defined as HVMOP_set_subpage
Are there any expected use-cases where a HVM guest would need access
to this hypercall? Is spp compatible with #VE? If not, I think it
would be better to integrate this with the
From: Zhang Yi Z
The Hypercall is defined as HVMOP_set_subpage
And the Interface's parameters is defined as
struct xen_hvm_subpage {
domid_t domid;
uint32_t access_map;
uint64_t gfn;
}
The user application: xl, or some other security control daemon. will
set the protection bitmap
