On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:50:13AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.09.17 at 13:31, wrote:
> > On 08/31/2017 01:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
> >>> +### Live Patching
> >>> +
> >>> +Status: Supported, x86 only
> >>> +
> >>> +Compile time disabled
> >>
>
On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 15:16 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > +### Null Scheduler
> > > +
> > > +Status: Experimental
> > > +
> > >
> > Can we say more than Experimental? I think it should
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> +### vTPM Support
>
> +
>
> + Status: Supported, x86 only
>
>
> This should probably be x86/vTPM. TPM, the way we are discussing
On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>>> +### vTPM Support
>>> +
>>> +Status: Supported, x86 only
>>
>> This should probably be x86/vTPM. TPM, the way we are discussing it, is
>> an x86-only implementation. ARM-based alternatives are not called TPM
>> AFAIK.
>
> Someone said th
On 11/09/17 17:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
+Supported, ARM32: zImage
+Supported, ARM64
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> > > +
> > > +Supported, x86: bzImage
> > > +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> > > +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - N
On 09/11/2017 05:16 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/17 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+ Supported, x86: bzImage
+ Supported, ARM3
On 11/09/17 17:15, George Dunlap wrote:
On 09/11/2017 04:54 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
Sorry I missed e-mail. It seems I was not CCed on it.
Sorry -- already had a pretty large CC list. I'll add you for the next one.
+### ARM/SMMU
+
+Status: Supported, with caveats
+
+Only ARM SMMU
On 11/09/17 15:16, George Dunlap wrote:
On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
+Supported, ARM32: zImage
+Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct
On 09/11/2017 04:54 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I missed e-mail. It seems I was not CCed on it.
Sorry -- already had a pretty large CC list. I'll add you for the next one.
+### ARM/SMMU
+
+ Status: Supported, with caveats
+
+Only ARM SMMU hardware is sup
On 09/11/2017 05:00 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
>>> +
>>> + Supported, x86: bzImage
>>> + Supported, ARM32: zImage
>>> + Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not
On 07/09/17 22:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
+Supported, ARM32: zImage
+Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
On ARM64 it's called Image.gz.
That's no
Hi,
Sorry I missed e-mail. It seems I was not CCed on it.
On 07/09/17 22:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
+### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
+
+Status: Supported
I guess non-pci devices on ARM also use the IOMMU? (SMMU)
Yes, they do.
+### AR
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:07:08PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/11/2017 04:02 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:16:13PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> +### Netbac
On 09/11/2017 04:02 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:16:13PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Netback
+
+Status, Linux (netback): Supported
+Status, F
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 03:16:13PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> +### Netback
> >> +
> >> +Status, Linux (netback): Supported
> >> +Status, FreeBSD (netback): Supported
> >> +Status, QEM
On 09/07/2017 03:56 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:52:49PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 09/01/2017 04:00 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
+### Direct-boot kernel image format
+
+Supported, x86: bzImage
>>>
On 09/07/2017 10:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
>> +
>> +Supported, x86: bzImage
>> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
>> +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
>
> On ARM64 it's called I
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:54:11PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> > > +
> > > +Supported, x86: bzImage
> > > +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> > > +Support
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:54:11PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> > +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> > +
> > +Supported, x86: bzImage
> > +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> > +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
>
>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, George Dunlap wrote:
> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> +
> +Supported, x86: bzImage
> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is correct]
On ARM64 it's called Image.gz.
> +Format which the toolstack accept for direct-bo
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
> > vMCE: Is MCE an x86-only thing, or could this conceivably by extended
> > to ARM?
>
> I think this can't be reasonably extended beyond x86 (and,
> considering their similar origin, ia64).
Yes, Jan is right. ARM has SE
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
> > +
> > +Status: Supported
>
> I guess non-pci devices on ARM also use the IOMMU? (SMMU)
Yes, they do.
> > +### ARM/SMMU
> > +
> > +Status: Supported, with caveats
> > +
> > +Only ARM SMMU hardware is
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:52:49PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 04:00 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> >> +
> >> +Supported, x86: bzImage
> >
> > Do you mean booting a PV guest? If s
On 09/07/2017 02:57 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/31/2017 12:25 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
[snip]
+### x86/PVH dom0
>>> ^ v2
+
+
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 11:49:00AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 12:25 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> +### x86/PV-on-HVM
> >
> > Do we really consider this a guest type? From both Xen and the
> > toolstack PoV this i
On 09/01/2017 04:00 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
>> +
>> +Supported, x86: bzImage
>
> Do you mean booting a PV guest? If so there are a few more formats.
>
>> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
>> +S
>>> On 07.09.17 at 13:31, wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 01:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
>>> +### Live Patching
>>> +
>>> +Status: Supported, x86 only
>>> +
>>> +Compile time disabled
>>
>> Bu we're settled to change that, aren't we? It was even meant to be
>> so in 4
On 08/31/2017 01:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
>> vMCE: Is MCE an x86-only thing, or could this conceivably by extended
>> to ARM?
>
> I think this can't be reasonably extended beyond x86 (and,
> considering their similar origin, ia64).
OK, I'll changet this to "x86
On 08/31/2017 12:25 PM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> Add a machine-readable file to describe what features are in what
>> state of being 'supported', as well as information about how long this
>> release will be supported, and so on.
>>
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> +### Direct-boot kernel image format
> +
> +Supported, x86: bzImage
Do you mean booting a PV guest? If so there are a few more formats.
> +Supported, ARM32: zImage
> +Supported, ARM64: Image [XXX - Not sure if this is co
>>> On 31.08.17 at 12:27, wrote:
> vMCE: Is MCE an x86-only thing, or could this conceivably by extended
> to ARM?
I think this can't be reasonably extended beyond x86 (and,
considering their similar origin, ia64).
> +## Tooling
> +
> +### gdbsx
> +
> +Status, x86: Supported
> +
> +Debugger
>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:25, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> +## Limits/Guest
>> +
>> +### Virtual CPUs
>> +
>> +Limit, x86 PV: 512
>> +Limit, x86 HVM: 128
>
> There has already been some discussion about the HVM vCPU limit due to
> other topics, is
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:27:19AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> Add a machine-readable file to describe what features are in what
> state of being 'supported', as well as information about how long this
> release will be supported, and so on.
>
> The document should be formatted using "semantic n
On 08/31/2017 12:03 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 31 August 2017 11:56
>> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
>> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu ;
>> Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
>> ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Da
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 31 August 2017 11:56
> To: Paul Durrant ; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Ian Jackson ; Wei Liu ;
> Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
> ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Dario Faggioli
> ; Tamas K Lengyel ;
> Roger Pau Monn
On 08/31/2017 11:46 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> +
>> +### Blkfront
>> +
>> +Status, Linux: Supported
>> +Status, FreeBSD: Supported, Security support external
>> +Status, Windows: Supported [XXX]
>> +
>> +Guest-side driver capable of speaking the Xen PV bloc
> -Original Message-
> +
> +### Blkfront
> +
> +Status, Linux: Supported
> +Status, FreeBSD: Supported, Security support external
> +Status, Windows: Supported [XXX]
> +
> +Guest-side driver capable of speaking the Xen PV block protocol
> +
> +### Netfront
> +
> +Status, Lin
Add a machine-readable file to describe what features are in what
state of being 'supported', as well as information about how long this
release will be supported, and so on.
The document should be formatted using "semantic newlines" [1], to make
changes easier.
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson
Signed
39 matches
Mail list logo
