On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 17:26 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 17:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of
> > non-LVM/phy disk backends."):
> > > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > Are some of the
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 17:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of non-LVM/phy
> disk backends."):
> > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Are some of these jobs not very similar to existing ones ?
> >
> > They differ
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of non-LVM/phy
disk backends."):
> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Are some of these jobs not very similar to existing ones ?
>
> They differ in the backing store used for the guest's disks, but
> otherwise t
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 16:21 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of non-LVM/phy
> disk backends."):
> > xen-create-image makes this tricky to do since it is rather LVM
> > centric. Now that we have the ability to install from d-i it's
> > possible
Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST v7 12/15] Add testing of non-LVM/phy disk
backends."):
> xen-create-image makes this tricky to do since it is rather LVM
> centric. Now that we have the ability to install from d-i it's
> possible to arrange fairly easily that they use non-LVM disk backend
> ar
xen-create-image makes this tricky to do since it is rather LVM
centric. Now that we have the ability to install from d-i it's
possible to arrange fairly easily that they use non-LVM disk backend
arrangements.
Here we add support to the test script and infra and create a bunch of
new jobs testing
