Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support
for ACPI fallback for shutdown"):
> You acked the xl one, so here is a separate one.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Thanks,
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 14:36 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
>>> Ian.
>>>
>>> From f560b7eed781a93567d69bcf90260c7475854766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Ian Campbell
>>> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 16:37:18 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Toolstack::libvirt: Support for ACPI fallback
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 14:36 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > Ian.
> >
> > From f560b7eed781a93567d69bcf90260c7475854766 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ian Campbell
> > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 16:37:18 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Toolstack::libvirt: Support for ACPI fallback for shutdown
> >
> > This
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:19 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:03 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI
>>> fallback for shutdown"):
>>>
If that were the case then I
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:19 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:03 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI
> > fallback for shutdown"):
> > > If that were the case then I think the below would do the trick, but as
>
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:03 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI
> fallback for shutdown"):
> > If that were the case then I think the below would do the trick, but as
> > I say I don't have an immediately convenient way to test, nor
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI
fallback for shutdown"):
> If that were the case then I think the below would do the trick, but as
> I say I don't have an immediately convenient way to test, nor a need
> since there are no such tests right now.
This patch
Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST] Toolstack::xl: Support for ACPI fallback
for shutdown"):
> HVM guests which do not include PV drivers will not shutdown after a
> simple "xl shutdown". Add a runvar to indicate that the guest will
> shutdown in response to an ACPI power event and apply this to
On Thu, 2015-05-07 at 10:07 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> HVM guests which do not include PV drivers will not shutdown after a
> simple "xl shutdown". Add a runvar to indicate that the guest will
> shutdown in response to an ACPI power event and apply this to the win7
> and winxp test jobs.
>
> Tes
HVM guests which do not include PV drivers will not shutdown after a
simple "xl shutdown". Add a runvar to indicate that the guest will
shutdown in response to an ACPI power event and apply this to the win7
and winxp test jobs.
Tested with:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3
test-amd64-amd
10 matches
Mail list logo
