Hi Vladimir,
Sorry for late response, I turned to work on other tasks and haven't
sent the test resulted to you.
Last weekend I got a email from Julien about a xen boot problem on
arm64, I just noticed that you have simplified the xen_boot.c to drop
xen_linux, xen_initrd and xen_xsm.
By this way
On 12.11.2015 14:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:08 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
>> While on it also change "xen_linux" to "xen_kernel" to be vendor-neutral
>> Could someone test please? I only compile-tested it
>
> I was expecting this patch to include
Hi Vladimir,
OK, I will test it.
On 12 November 2015 at 21:08, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> While on it also change "xen_linux" to "xen_kernel" to be vendor-neutral
> Could someone test please? I only compile-tested it
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Soft
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 14:08 +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> While on it also change "xen_linux" to "xen_kernel" to be vendor-neutral
> Could someone test please? I only compile-tested it
I was expecting this patch to include a change
to ./util/grub.d/20_linux_xen.in to update
While on it also change "xen_linux" to "xen_kernel" to be vendor-neutral
Could someone test please? I only compile-tested it
diff --git a/docs/grub.texi b/docs/grub.texi
index 1df3db2..112b42b 100644
--- a/docs/grub.texi
+++ b/docs/grub.texi
@@ -3859,7 +3859,7 @@ you forget a command, you can run t
