On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:18:57AM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
[...]
> > > +
> >
> > I suppose this is the old syntax?
> >
> It is.
>
> > I'm asking because I want to be sure we still support the old syntax. I
> > think we still support the old syntax from the look of the changes below
> > but
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 10:58 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:51PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > ---
> > docs/man/xlcpupool.cfg.pod.5 | 22 +++---
> > tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 17 ++---
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:51PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> instead of just list of single pCPUs or NUMA node IDs, as
> it happens right now.
>
> On the other hand, after this change, strings containing
> pCPUs and NUMA node ranges is supported. The syntax is the
> same one supported by the
instead of just list of single pCPUs or NUMA node IDs, as
it happens right now.
On the other hand, after this change, strings containing
pCPUs and NUMA node ranges is supported. The syntax is the
same one supported by the "cpus" and "cpus_soft" config
switch, i.e., "4-8" or "node:1,12-18,^14".
Th
