Hi Dario,
2015-03-17 10:12 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
> On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 16:30 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
>> Hi Dario,
>>
> Hey,
>
>> 2015-03-16 13:05 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
>
>> >
>> > This change also takes the chance to add a scratch
>> > cpumask, to avoid having to create one more
>> > cpu
>>>
>>> This change also takes the chance to add a scratch
>>> cpumask, to avoid having to create one more
>>> cpumask_var_t on the stack of the dumping routine.
>>
>> Actually, I have a question about the strength of this design. When we
>> have a machine with many cpus, we will end up with alloca
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 16:30 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> Hi Dario,
>
Hey,
> 2015-03-16 13:05 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
> >
> > This change also takes the chance to add a scratch
> > cpumask, to avoid having to create one more
> > cpumask_var_t on the stack of the dumping routine.
>
> Actually, I ha
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 19:05 +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 05:05 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > @@ -218,7 +224,6 @@ __q_elem(struct list_head *elem)
> > static void
> > rt_dump_vcpu(const struct scheduler *ops, const struct rt_vcpu *svc)
> > {
> > -char cpustr[1024];
> > cp
>>> On 17.03.15 at 12:10, wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 08:30 PM, Meng Xu wrote:
>> 2015-03-16 13:05 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
>>> This change also takes the chance to add a scratch
>>> cpumask, to avoid having to create one more
>>> cpumask_var_t on the stack of the dumping routine.
>>
>> Actually, I
On 03/16/2015 08:30 PM, Meng Xu wrote:
> Hi Dario,
>
> 2015-03-16 13:05 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
>> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
>> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
>> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
>> same cpupool, while hard affinity is alrea
Hi Dario,
2015-03-16 13:05 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
On 03/16/2015 05:05 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
>
> Inst
In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
of the output of dumping domains info.
Instead, print the intersection between hard
affinity and online
