Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code
from xc_dom_allocate()"):
> I'd be ok with either leaving this as is (and tagging CID 1055188 as
> intentioanl) or adding the null initialiser as you suggested in your
> "However: "
I w
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:33 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code
> from xc_dom_allocate()"):
> > On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:24 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Jennifer Herbert writes ("[Xen-dev
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code
from xc_dom_allocate()"):
> On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:24 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Jennifer Herbert writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code
> > from xc_dom_allocate(
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:24 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jennifer Herbert writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code
> from xc_dom_allocate()"):
> > The only place that jumps to 'err:' does so because !dom, which is
> > rechecked in 'err
Jennifer Herbert writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] libxc: Removing dead code
from xc_dom_allocate()"):
> The only place that jumps to 'err:' does so because !dom, which is
> rechecked in 'err:'. This patch simplifies, giving the same result.
I'm not p
On 01/07/15 18:37, Jennifer Herbert wrote:
> The only place that jumps to 'err:' does so because !dom, which is
> rechecked in 'err:'. This patch simplifies, giving the same result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jennifer Herbert
Coverity-ID: 1055188
~Andrew
> ---
> tools/libxc/xc_dom_core.c |7 +
The only place that jumps to 'err:' does so because !dom, which is
rechecked in 'err:'. This patch simplifies, giving the same result.
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Herbert
---
tools/libxc/xc_dom_core.c |7 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_dom_co
