On 17/02/16 16:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Afaict this was never necessary on a 64-bit hypervisor, and was instead
> just blindly cloned over from 32-bit code: We don't fiddle with (and
> hence don't reload) any of DS, ES, FS, or GS, and an exception on IRET
> itself can equally well be reported to th
Afaict this was never necessary on a 64-bit hypervisor, and was instead
just blindly cloned over from 32-bit code: We don't fiddle with (and
hence don't reload) any of DS, ES, FS, or GS, and an exception on IRET
itself can equally well be reported to the guest as that very exception
on the target o