Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH 4/4] libxl: More probably detect reentry of
destroyed ctx"):
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:51:12PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In libxl_ctx_free:
> >
> > 1. Move the GC_INIT earlier, so that we can:
>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu
Thanks.
> > +assert(!ctx->osevent_in_ho
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:51:12PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In libxl_ctx_free:
>
> 1. Move the GC_INIT earlier, so that we can:
>
> 2. Take the lock around most of the work. This is technically
>unnecessary since calling any other libxl entrypoint on a ctx being
>passed to libxl_ctx_f
In libxl_ctx_free:
1. Move the GC_INIT earlier, so that we can:
2. Take the lock around most of the work. This is technically
unnecessary since calling any other libxl entrypoint on a ctx being
passed to libxl_ctx_free risks undefined behaviour. But, taking
the lock allows us to much m
