>>> On 01.03.16 at 19:57, wrote:
> The inclusion rules conditions for errno.h were unnecesserily complicated, and
> required the includer to jump through hoops if they wished to avoid getting
> multiple namespaces worth of constants.
>
> Vastly simply the logic, and document what is going on.
Ni
On 3/1/16 12:57 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The inclusion rules conditions for errno.h were unnecesserily complicated, and
> required the includer to jump through hoops if they wished to avoid getting
> multiple namespaces worth of constants.
>
> Vastly simply the logic, and document what is going
The inclusion rules conditions for errno.h were unnecesserily complicated, and
required the includer to jump through hoops if they wished to avoid getting
multiple namespaces worth of constants.
Vastly simply the logic, and document what is going on.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beul
