On 16/07/16 14:55, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 19:02 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> The initial placement algorithm sometimes picks cpus outside of the
>> mask it's given, does a lot of unnecessary bitmasking, does its own
>> separate load calculation, and completely ignores vcpu
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 19:02 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> The initial placement algorithm sometimes picks cpus outside of the
> mask it's given, does a lot of unnecessary bitmasking, does its own
> separate load calculation, and completely ignores vcpu hard and soft
> affinities.
>
Not to mention
On 15/07/16 19:02, George Dunlap wrote:
> The initial placement algorithm sometimes picks cpus outside of the
> mask it's given, does a lot of unnecessary bitmasking, does its own
> separate load calculation, and completely ignores vcpu hard and soft
> affinities. Just get rid of it and rely on th
The initial placement algorithm sometimes picks cpus outside of the
mask it's given, does a lot of unnecessary bitmasking, does its own
separate load calculation, and completely ignores vcpu hard and soft
affinities. Just get rid of it and rely on the schedulers to do
initial placement.
Signed-of
