Hi Jan,
On 19/05/2017 07:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.17 at 17:12, wrote:
On 18/05/17 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
The compiler dislikes duplicat "const", and the ones it complains about
s/duplicat/duplicate/
look like they we in fact meant to be placed differently.
Also fix array_access
>>> On 18.05.17 at 20:35, wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 18/05/17 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > The compiler dislikes duplicat "const", and the ones it complains about
>>
>> s/duplicat/duplicate/
>>
>> > look like they we in fact meant to be placed differentl
>>> On 18.05.17 at 17:12, wrote:
> On 18/05/17 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The compiler dislikes duplicat "const", and the ones it complains about
>
> s/duplicat/duplicate/
>
>> look like they we in fact meant to be placed differently.
>>
>> Also fix array_access_okay() (just like on x86), desp
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/05/17 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > The compiler dislikes duplicat "const", and the ones it complains about
>
> s/duplicat/duplicate/
>
> > look like they we in fact meant to be placed differently.
> >
> > Also fix array_access_okay() (ju
Hi,
On 18/05/17 09:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
The compiler dislikes duplicat "const", and the ones it complains about
s/duplicat/duplicate/
look like they we in fact meant to be placed differently.
Also fix array_access_okay() (just like on x86), despite the construct
being unused on ARM: -Wint
The compiler dislikes duplicat "const", and the ones it complains about
look like they we in fact meant to be placed differently.
Also fix array_access_okay() (just like on x86), despite the construct
being unused on ARM: -Wint-in-bool-context, enabled by default in
gcc 7, doesn't like multiplicat
