>>> On 06.01.17 at 16:35, wrote:
On 05.01.17 at 19:59, wrote:
>> On 05/01/17 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.01.17 at 22:11, wrote:
On 12/12/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> @@ -723,6 +741,66 @@ int handle_xse
>>> On 05.01.17 at 19:59, wrote:
> On 05/01/17 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.01.17 at 22:11, wrote:
>>> On 12/12/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -1791,6 +1795,34 @@ static int inject_swint(enum x86_swint_t
generate_exception(fault_type, error_code);
}
+sta
On 05/01/17 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.01.17 at 22:11, wrote:
>> On 12/12/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> @@ -1791,6 +1795,34 @@ static int inject_swint(enum x86_swint_t
>>> generate_exception(fault_type, error_code);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void clear_bnd(struct x86_emulate_ctxt
>>> On 04.01.17 at 22:11, wrote:
> On 12/12/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -1791,6 +1795,34 @@ static int inject_swint(enum x86_swint_t
>> generate_exception(fault_type, error_code);
>> }
>>
>> +static void clear_bnd(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>> + const struct
On 12/12/16 10:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> @@ -1791,6 +1795,34 @@ static int inject_swint(enum x86_swint_t
> generate_exception(fault_type, error_code);
> }
>
> +static void clear_bnd(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
> + const struct x86_emulate_ops *ops, enum vex_pfx pfx)
Considering that we surface MPX to HVM guests, instructions we emulate
should also correctly deal with MPX state. While for now BND*
instructions don't get emulated, the effect of branches (which we do
emulate) without BND prefix should be taken care of.
No need to alter XABORT behavior: While not
