Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/PV: relax LDT address check

2016-01-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/01/16 14:06, Jan Beulich wrote: > There's no point placing restrictions on its address when the LDT size > is zero. > > Also convert a local variable to a slightly more efficient type. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper __

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86/PV: relax LDT address check

2016-01-20 Thread Jan Beulich
There's no point placing restrictions on its address when the LDT size is zero. Also convert a local variable to a slightly more efficient type. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c @@ -3348,8 +3348,8 @@ long do_mmuext_op( case MMUEXT_SET_LDT: