On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24:06AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Daniel Kiper wrote:
>
> > -static const struct efi efi_xen __initconst = {
> > - .systab = NULL, /* Initialized later. */
> > - .runtime_version = 0,/* Initialized later. */
> > - .mps
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:10:51AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 20/06/2017 21:14, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
> > good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
> > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but n
* Daniel Kiper wrote:
> -static const struct efi efi_xen __initconst = {
> - .systab = NULL, /* Initialized later. */
> - .runtime_version = 0,/* Initialized later. */
> - .mps = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> - .acpi
On 20/06/2017 21:14, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
> good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
> a few times until now.
On 20 June 2017 at 22:14, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
> good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
> a few times unti
Current approach, wholesale efi struct initialization from efi_xen, is not
good. Usually if new member is defined then it is properly initialized in
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c but not in arch/x86/xen/efi.c. As I saw it happened
a few times until now. So, let's initialize only efi struct members use
