On 28/06/17 18:51, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 28/06/17 17:14, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:16:33AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/06/17 07:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
Marek Marczykowski-Góreck
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/06/17 17:14, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:16:33AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 28/06/17 07:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 06/28/17
> >> 3:09 AM >>>
> >
On 28/06/17 17:14, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:16:33AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 28/06/17 07:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 06/28/17
>> 3:09 AM >>>
It's bit 9 not 10 (which is ibs).
>>> Indeed, but shouldn't it rather b
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:16:33AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/06/17 07:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 06/28/17
> 3:09 AM >>>
> >> It's bit 9 not 10 (which is ibs).
> > Indeed, but shouldn't it rather be removed? We don't expose it from the
> > hypervisor at
On 28/06/17 07:09, Jan Beulich wrote:
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 06/28/17 3:09
AM >>>
>> It's bit 9 not 10 (which is ibs).
> Indeed, but shouldn't it rather be removed? We don't expose it from the
> hypervisor at all anymore:
>
> XEN_CPUFEATURE(OSVW, 3*32+ 9) /* OS Visible Wo
>>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki 06/28/17 3:09
>>> AM >>>
>It's bit 9 not 10 (which is ibs).
Indeed, but shouldn't it rather be removed? We don't expose it from the
hypervisor at all anymore:
XEN_CPUFEATURE(OSVW, 3*32+ 9) /* OS Visible Workaround */
(note the absence of any marker cha
It's bit 9 not 10 (which is ibs).
Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
---
tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
index 1cf7973..a4a69af 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl_cpuid.c
+++ b/
