On 15/11/2016 13:45, "Andrew Cooper" wrote:
>On 15/11/16 13:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 11/15/2016 01:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader.
We
pass which
On 15/11/16 13:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 01:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We
>>> pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter.
>>>
>>> If DSDT
On 11/15/2016 01:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We
>> pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter.
>>
>> If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular archit
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ endif
> clean: subdirs-clean
> rm -f roms.inc roms.inc.new acpi.h
> rm -f hvmloader hvmloader.tmp *.o $(DEPS)
> - $(MAKE) -C $(ACPI_PATH) ACPI_BUILD_DIR=$(CURDIR) clean
> + $(MAKE) -C $(ACPI_PATH) ACPI_BUILD_DIR=$(CURDIR)
> DSDT_FILES="$(DSDT_FILES)"
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We
> pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter.
>
> If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will be built.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo
There is no reason to build, for example, dsdt_pvh.asl for hvmloader. We
pass which DSDTs to build via DSDT_FILES parameter.
If DSDT_FILES is empty all DSDTs for a particular architecture will be built.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
tools/firmware/hvmloader/Makefile | 8
tools/li
