On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 19:23 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 16/29] libxl: ao: Provide
> manip_refcnt"):
> > On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 20:10 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * A "manip" is a
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 16/29] libxl: ao: Provide
manip_refcnt"):
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 20:10 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * A "manip" is a libxl public function manipulating this ao, which
> > + * has a pointer to it. W
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 20:10 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> +/*
> + * A "manip" is a libxl public function manipulating this ao, which
> + * has a pointer to it. We have to not destroy it while that's the
> + * case, obviously.
It might be nice to the reader to make a reference to the "An ao and its
Previously we used in_initiator to stop the ao being freed while we
were still in the initiator function (which would result in the
initiator's call to lixl__ao_inprogress accessing the ao after it had
been freed).
We are going to introduce a new libxl entrypoint which finds, and
operates on, ongo
