On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:41:29PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 02:20 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
> >
> > The only one usage will be removed in the following
> > conge
This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
The only one usage will be removed in the following
congestion control patches.
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Cc: "Roger Pau Monné"
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
Cc: Juergen Gross
Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenp
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 02:20 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
>
> The only one usage will be removed in the following
> congestion control patches.
Hello Ming,
The title of this patch is misleading si
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 02:41:05PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
>
> 'should be'? That does not sound encouraging?
Sorry
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:24:44PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
> >
> > The only one usage will be removed in the following
>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 06:41:29PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 02:20 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> > unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
> >
> > The only one usage will be removed in the following
> > conge
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
>
> The only one usage will be removed in the following
> congestion control patches.
Would it be better to simply fix blk_mq_{start
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:20:58AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This interfaces will be removed soon, so use quiesce and
> unquiesce instead, which should be more safe.
'should be'? That does not sound encouraging?
>
> The only one usage will be removed in the following
> congestion control patches.
