On 06/03/2015 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... by introducing a "dom0_nodes" option augmenting the "dom0_mem" and
> "dom0_max_vcpus" ones.
>
> Note that this gives meaning to MEMF_exact_node specified alone (i.e.
> implicitly combined with NUMA_NO_NODE): In such a case any node inside
> the domain's
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:19 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... by introducing a "dom0_nodes" option augmenting the "dom0_mem" and
> "dom0_max_vcpus" ones.
>
> Note that this gives meaning to MEMF_exact_node specified alone (i.e.
> implicitly combined with NUMA_NO_NODE): In such a case any node inside
... by introducing a "dom0_nodes" option augmenting the "dom0_mem" and
"dom0_max_vcpus" ones.
Note that this gives meaning to MEMF_exact_node specified alone (i.e.
implicitly combined with NUMA_NO_NODE): In such a case any node inside
the domain's node mask is acceptable, but no other node. This c
