>>> On 07.12.16 at 13:21, wrote:
> On 07/12/16 09:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.12.16 at 17:20, wrote:
>>> On 06/12/16 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -3977,33 +3981,21 @@ x86_emulate(
break;
case 0xe0 ... 0xe2: /* loop{,z,nz} */ {
+unsigned long
On 07/12/16 09:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.16 at 17:20, wrote:
>> On 06/12/16 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> @@ -3977,33 +3981,21 @@ x86_emulate(
>>> break;
>>>
>>> case 0xe0 ... 0xe2: /* loop{,z,nz} */ {
>>> +unsigned long count = get_loop_count(&_regs, ad_bytes) -
>>> On 06.12.16 at 17:20, wrote:
> On 06/12/16 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -3977,33 +3981,21 @@ x86_emulate(
>> break;
>>
>> case 0xe0 ... 0xe2: /* loop{,z,nz} */ {
>> +unsigned long count = get_loop_count(&_regs, ad_bytes) - 1;
>> int do_jmp = !(_regs.eflags &
On 06/12/16 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Rename _get_rep_prefix() to make it more visibly fit other use cases
> and introduce a companion "put". Use them for repeated string insn
> handling as well as LOOP/J?CXZ instead of open coding the same logic a
> couple of times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulic
Rename _get_rep_prefix() to make it more visibly fit other use cases
and introduce a companion "put". Use them for repeated string insn
handling as well as LOOP/J?CXZ instead of open coding the same logic a
couple of times.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
