Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/pv: drop priv_op prefix in emul-priv-op.c

2017-08-31 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:45, wrote: > Drop the prefix because they live in their own file now. One exception > is wbinvd handler because drpooing the prefix will clash with the > actual wbinvd function. How about _wbinvd() (single underscores as prefix are okay for static functions) or do_wbinvd()?

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] x86/pv: drop priv_op prefix in emul-priv-op.c

2017-08-31 Thread Wei Liu
Drop the prefix because they live in their own file now. One exception is wbinvd handler because drpooing the prefix will clash with the actual wbinvd function. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu --- xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-priv-op.c | 99 +- 1 file changed, 50 insertion