On 11/22/2017 11:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.17 at 19:02, wrote:
>> On 11/21/2017 08:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
+### x86/Nested PV
+
+Status, x86 HVM: Tech Preview
+
+This means running a Xen hypervisor inside an HVM doma
On 11/22/2017 11:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+### x86/HVM EFI
+
+Status: Supported
+
+Booting a guest via guest EFI firmware
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this say OVMF, to avoid covering possible other
>>> implementations?
>>
>> I don't expect that we'll ever need more than one EFI
On 11/22/2017 11:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.11.17 at 19:02, wrote:
>> On 11/21/2017 08:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
+### x86/Nested PV
+
+Status, x86 HVM: Tech Preview
+
+This means running a Xen hypervisor inside an HVM doma
>>> On 21.11.17 at 19:02, wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 08:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
>>> +### x86/Nested PV
>>> +
>>> +Status, x86 HVM: Tech Preview
>>> +
>>> +This means running a Xen hypervisor inside an HVM domain,
>>> +with support for PV L2 guests only
>>> +(i
On 11/21/2017 08:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
>> +### x86/Nested PV
>> +
>> +Status, x86 HVM: Tech Preview
>> +
>> +This means running a Xen hypervisor inside an HVM domain,
>> +with support for PV L2 guests only
>> +(i.e., hardware virtualization extensions not
>>> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
> +### x86/Nested PV
> +
> +Status, x86 HVM: Tech Preview
> +
> +This means running a Xen hypervisor inside an HVM domain,
> +with support for PV L2 guests only
> +(i.e., hardware virtualization extensions not provided
> +to the guest).
> +
> +This works, but h
x86-specific virtual hardware provided by the hypervisor, toolstack,
or QEMU.
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
---
Added emulated QEMU support, to replace docs/misc/qemu-xen-security.
Need to figure out what to do with the "backing storage image format"
section of that document.
CC: Ian Jackson
CC
