>>> On 14.09.16 at 19:05, wrote:
> On 08/09/16 14:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
>> @@ -336,6 +336,27 @@ union vex {
>> ptr[1] = rex | REX_PREFIX; \
>> } while (0)
>>
>> +union evex {
>> +uint8_
On 08/09/16 14:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This way we can at least size (and e.g. skip) them if needed, and we
> also won't raise the wrong fault due to not having read all relevant
> bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> TBD: I'm kind of undecided whether to right away propagate evex.R into
This way we can at least size (and e.g. skip) them if needed, and we
also won't raise the wrong fault due to not having read all relevant
bytes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
TBD: I'm kind of undecided whether to right away propagate evex.R into
modrm_reg (and then also deal with the new me
