Hi George,
On 11/21/2017 10:45 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
+### ARM/SMMUv1
+
+Status: Supported
+
+### ARM/SMMUv2
+
+Status: Supported
Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the corresponding
x86 patch?
S
>>> On 21.11.17 at 13:39, wrote:
> What about something like this?
>
> ### IOMMU
>
> Status, AMD IOMMU: Supported
> Status, Intel VT-d: Supported
> Status, ARM SMMUv1: Supported
> Status, ARM SMMUv2: Supported
Fine with me, as it makes things explicit.
Jan
___
On Nov 21, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Jan Beulich
mailto:jbeul...@suse.com>> wrote:
On 21.11.17 at 11:45,
mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com>> wrote:
On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.11.17 at 16:41,
mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com>> wrote:
+### ARM/SMMUv1
+
+Status: Supported
+
+###
>>> On 21.11.17 at 11:45, wrote:
> On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
>>> +### ARM/SMMUv1
>>> +
>>> +Status: Supported
>>> +
>>> +### ARM/SMMUv2
>>> +
>>> +Status: Supported
>>
>> Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the corresponding
On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
>> +### ARM/SMMUv1
>> +
>> +Status: Supported
>> +
>> +### ARM/SMMUv2
>> +
>> +Status: Supported
>
> Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the corresponding
> x86 patch?
Since there was recently a time
>>> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote:
> +### ARM/SMMUv1
> +
> +Status: Supported
> +
> +### ARM/SMMUv2
> +
> +Status: Supported
Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the corresponding
x86 patch?
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@li
Hardware support and guest type.
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
---
CC: Ian Jackson
CC: Wei Liu
CC: Andrew Cooper
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Stefano Stabellini
CC: Konrad Wilk
CC: Tim Deegan
CC: Julien Grall
---
SUPPORT.md | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff
