On 22/05/17 21:42, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> 49 files changed, 1548 insertions(+), 1477 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_full.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types_full.h
>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_full.c
>
>
> Do yo
> 49 files changed, 1548 insertions(+), 1477 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_full.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types_full.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_full.c
Do you have this in a tree that can be pulled?
-boris
__
Today paravirtualization is a all-or-nothing game: either a kernel is
compiled with no paravirtualization support at all, or it is supporting
paravirtualized environments like Xen pv-guests or lguest additionally
to some paravirtualized tuning for KVM, Hyperv, VMWare or Xen
HVM-guests.
As support
