Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ns16550: enable support for Pericom controllers

2016-02-29 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 29.02.16 at 17:56, wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:22:35AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Patches 1 and 2 are meant to go in. Patch 3 is a prerequisite to patch >> 4 and may go in as well, but patch 4 is RFC because with the Pericom >> board I have MSI doesn't appear to function. Since it

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ns16550: enable support for Pericom controllers

2016-02-29 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 04:22:35AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > Patches 1 and 2 are meant to go in. Patch 3 is a prerequisite to patch > 4 and may go in as well, but patch 4 is RFC because with the Pericom > board I have MSI doesn't appear to function. Since it also does not > work in baremetal Linu

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ns16550: enable support for Pericom controllers

2016-02-23 Thread Jan Beulich
Patches 1 and 2 are meant to go in. Patch 3 is a prerequisite to patch 4 and may go in as well, but patch 4 is RFC because with the Pericom board I have MSI doesn't appear to function. Since it also does not work in baremetal Linux when doing the trivial adjustments needed in its driver, I suspect