Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> This is missing my point.
>>
>> We need to consider the case of a modified libvirt with the old, broken,
>> libxl too.
>>
>
> For that case, we might want to make sure that the new timeout passed to
> libxl_wait_for_me
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 10:22 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:52 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:08 -0700, Mike Latimer wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday,
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:52 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:08 -0700, Mike Latimer wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, March 05, 2015 05:49:35 PM Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2015-
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:52 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:08 -0700, Mike Latimer wrote:
> > > On Thursday, March 05, 2015 05:49:35 PM Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 09:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
> > > amount of memory, where the c
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:08 -0700, Mike Latimer wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 05, 2015 05:49:35 PM Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > this patch series fixes the freemem lo
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
> > amount of memory, where the current wait time is not enough.
> >
> > In order to be able to handle ar
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:08 -0700, Mike Latimer wrote:
> On Thursday, March 05, 2015 05:49:35 PM Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
> > > amount of memor
On Thursday, March 05, 2015 05:49:35 PM Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
> > amount of memory, where the current wait time is not enough.
> >
> > In order to
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:08 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
> amount of memory, where the current wait time is not enough.
>
> In order to be able to handle arbitrarly large amount of ram, we
> implement in libxl_
On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 02:54:50 PM Mike Latimer wrote:
> Thanks for all the help and patience as we've worked through this. Ack to
> the whole series:
>
> Acked-by: Mike Latimer
I guess the more correct response is:
Reviewed-by: Mike Latimer
Tested-by: Mike Latimer
-Mike
_
On Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:08:38 AM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
> amount of memory, where the current wait time is not enough.
>
> In order to be able to handle arbitrarly large amount of ram, we
> implement in li
Hi all,
this patch series fixes the freemem loop on machines with very large
amount of memory, where the current wait time is not enough.
In order to be able to handle arbitrarly large amount of ram, we
implement in libxl_wait_for_memory_target a policy of waiting until dom0
is making progress.
13 matches
Mail list logo
