Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: domain destroy fixes

2015-03-30 Thread Jim Fehlig
Jim Fehlig wrote: > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:08:33PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: >> >> >>> This small series of patches fixes some issues wrt domain destroy in >>> the libxl driver. The primary motivation for this work is to >>> prevent locking the virDo

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: domain destroy fixes

2015-03-30 Thread Anthony PERARD
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:08:33PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > This small series of patches fixes some issues wrt domain destroy in > the libxl driver. The primary motivation for this work is to > prevent locking the virDomainObj during long running destroy operations > on large memory domains. >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: domain destroy fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Jim Fehlig
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:08:33PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> This small series of patches fixes some issues wrt domain destroy in >> the libxl driver. The primary motivation for this work is to >> prevent locking the virDomainObj during long running destroy op

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: domain destroy fixes

2015-03-27 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:08:33PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > This small series of patches fixes some issues wrt domain destroy in > the libxl driver. The primary motivation for this work is to > prevent locking the virDomainObj during long running destroy operations > on large memory domains. >

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: domain destroy fixes

2015-03-25 Thread Jim Fehlig
This small series of patches fixes some issues wrt domain destroy in the libxl driver. The primary motivation for this work is to prevent locking the virDomainObj during long running destroy operations on large memory domains. Patch 1 moves job acquisition from libxlDomainStart to it's callers so