Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]acpi: enlarge NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES from 4 to 5

2017-05-10 Thread Zhangbo (Oscar)
>> --- a/xen/include/xen/acpi.h >> +++ b/xen/include/xen/acpi.h >> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ >> * Fixmap pages to reserve for ACPI boot-time tables (see asm-x86/fixmap.h >or >> * asm-arm/config.h) >> */ >> -#define NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES 4 >> +#define NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES 5 > >Well, this is the ki

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]acpi: enlarge NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES from 4 to 5

2017-05-10 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 04.05.17 at 04:59, wrote: > --- a/xen/include/xen/acpi.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/acpi.h > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > * Fixmap pages to reserve for ACPI boot-time tables (see asm-x86/fixmap.h or > * asm-arm/config.h) > */ > -#define NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES 4 > +#define NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES 5

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]acpi: enlarge NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES from 4 to 5

2017-05-10 Thread Julien Grall
Hello, On 05/10/2017 04:29 AM, Zhangbo (Oscar) wrote: Ping Most of the maintainers have nowadays filters to flag e-mail with them CCed and look less often to rest. If you want to draw attention to your patch, you should CC relevant maintainers (you can find them in MAINTAINERS). In

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]acpi: enlarge NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES from 4 to 5

2017-05-09 Thread Zhangbo (Oscar)
Ping >In __acpi_map_table(), it suppose all ACPI tables may not exceed 4 pages. >but nowadays ACPI tables, such as SRAT table, are large enough, On my >BIOS board, the SRAT table achieves the size of 14428B, although it's >above 3 pages and within 4pages, but in __acpi_map_table(),

[Xen-devel] [PATCH]acpi: enlarge NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES from 4 to 5

2017-05-03 Thread Zhangbo (Oscar)
In __acpi_map_table(), it suppose all ACPI tables may not exceed 4 pages. but nowadays ACPI tables, such as SRAT table, are large enough, On my BIOS board, the SRAT table achieves the size of 14428B, although it's above 3 pages and within 4pages, but in __acpi_map_table(), it maps p