On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote:
> On 14.08.2015 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.08.15 at 14:59, wrote:
>>> On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.08.15 at 16:09, wrote:
> Todo:
> * Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
On 14.08.2015 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 14:59, wrote:
>> On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.08.15 at 16:09, wrote:
Todo:
* Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
>>>
>>> Because of?
>>
>> The discussion in this thread:
>>
>> [Xen-deve
>>> On 14.08.15 at 14:59, wrote:
> On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.08.15 at 16:09, wrote:
>>> Todo:
>>> * Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
>>
>> Because of?
>
> The discussion in this thread:
>
> [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3.1 2/2] xsplice: Add hook for bu
On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.08.15 at 16:09, wrote:
>> Todo:
>> * Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
>
> Because of?
The discussion in this thread:
[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3.1 2/2] xsplice: Add hook for build_id
was:
>>> On 05.08.15 at 16:09, wrote:
> Todo:
> * Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
Because of?
> * Maybe convert to binary transport to userland instead of printable form
Indeed.
> @@ -360,11 +366,30 @@ DO(xen_version)(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void)
> arg)
>
>
Todo:
* Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
* Maybe convert to binary transport to userland instead of printable form
* use ld to actually embed the build ID
* convert to textual representation in hypervisor and report in
printable form
Signed-off-by: Martin Pohlack
---
xe
