On 03/31/2017 10:33 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH] xl: Add 'pvh' config option"):
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:59:09AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> That would make the toolstack have three guest types while the
>>> hypervisor has two.
> Is that a problem, concep
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH] xl: Add 'pvh' config option"):
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:59:09AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > That would make the toolstack have three guest types while the
> > hypervisor has two.
Is that a problem, conceptually ? It seems to me to be accurate here.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:59:09AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 09:49 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:43:07AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 03/31/2017 06:23 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:59:09AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 09:49 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:43:07AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> On 03/31/2017 06:23 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
On 03/31/2017 09:49 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:43:07AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 03/31/2017 06:23 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
In addition to 'device_model_version="none"' config option users can
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:43:07AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 06:23 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> In addition to 'device_model_version="none"' config option users can
> >> also use 'pvh=1' in xl configuration
On 03/31/2017 06:23 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> In addition to 'device_model_version="none"' config option users can
>> also use 'pvh=1' in xl configuration file when creating a PVH guest.
> I'm not sure, but I think the plan was
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:23:04AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > In addition to 'device_model_version="none"' config option users can
> > also use 'pvh=1' in xl configuration file when creating a PVH guest.
>
> I'm not sure, bu
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> In addition to 'device_model_version="none"' config option users can
> also use 'pvh=1' in xl configuration file when creating a PVH guest.
I'm not sure, but I think the plan was to remove device_model_version="none"
and instead ju
In addition to 'device_model_version="none"' config option users can
also use 'pvh=1' in xl configuration file when creating a PVH guest.
We can skip parsing options related to device model once we establish
that we are building PVH guest.
Also process 'device_model_version="none"' for HVM guests
10 matches
Mail list logo