On 14 June 2016 at 15:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I didn't lose it, I thought you had already committed it as
> 21cbfe5f37aaa3a13d3af28454e762c05be67429, but I realize now that
> although they have the same commit message, they are not the same patch.
>
> I was wondering how it got upstream gi
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 May 2016 at 16:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2016, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
> >> which it implies are not included manually.
> >>
> >> This commit was created with
On 30 May 2016 at 16:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
>> which it implies are not included manually.
>>
>> This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter May
On Tue, 24 May 2016, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
> which it implies are not included manually.
>
> This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Added to my queue
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:27:18PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
> which it implies are not included manually.
>
> This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
Acked-by: Anthony PERARD
--
Clean up includes so that osdep.h is included first and headers
which it implies are not included manually.
This commit was created with scripts/clean-includes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
hw/usb/xen-usb.c | 5 +
include/hw/xen/xen.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deleti
