On 09/29/2015 07:39 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Boris Ostrovsky writes:
On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris
Boris Ostrovsky writes:
> On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 12:
On 25/09/15 10:59, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Currently there is a number of issues preventing PVHVM Xen guests from
> doing successful kexec/kdump:
> - Bound event channels.
> - Registered vcpu_info.
> - PIRQ/emuirq mappings.
> - shared_info frame after XENMAPSPACE_shared_info operation.
> - Active
On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Also, I a
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:19:57PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be use
On 09/25/2015 03:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be used in the
hypervisor --- currently AFAICS it is only processed under
is_hardw
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 01:17:40PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >>Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be used in the
> >>hypervisor --- currently AFAICS it is only processed under
> >>is_hardware_domain(). Are there other patches that
On 09/25/2015 12:07 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Also, I am not sure I see how this new op will be used in the
hypervisor --- currently AFAICS it is only processed under
is_hardware_domain(). Are there other patches that will support HVM
guests?
Please see my Xen series:
http://lists.xenproject.o
Boris Ostrovsky writes:
> On 09/25/2015 09:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:59:52AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>> Currently there is a number of issues preventing PVHVM Xen guests from
>>> doing successful kexec/kdump:
>>> - Bound event channels.
>>> - Regist
On 09/25/2015 09:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:59:52AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Currently there is a number of issues preventing PVHVM Xen guests from
doing successful kexec/kdump:
- Bound event channels.
- Registered vcpu_info.
- PIRQ/emuirq mappings.
- sh
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:59:52AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Currently there is a number of issues preventing PVHVM Xen guests from
> doing successful kexec/kdump:
> - Bound event channels.
> - Registered vcpu_info.
> - PIRQ/emuirq mappings.
> - shared_info frame after XENMAPSPACE_shared_inf
Currently there is a number of issues preventing PVHVM Xen guests from
doing successful kexec/kdump:
- Bound event channels.
- Registered vcpu_info.
- PIRQ/emuirq mappings.
- shared_info frame after XENMAPSPACE_shared_info operation.
- Active grant mappings.
Basically, newly booted kernel stumbles
12 matches
Mail list logo
